Abstract
In the that emerged from the Second International Workshop on the Assessment of Animal Welfare at Farm and Group Level, Sandoe, Christiansen, & Appleby (2003) challenged participants to ponder four fundamental questions:a. What is the baseline standard for morally acceptable animal welfare?b. What is a good animal life?c. What farming purposes are legitimate?d. What kinds of compromises are acceptable in a less-than-perfect world?Continued reflection on those questions warrants examination of the shape of our modern agricultural ethic. It also calls for a reexamination of recent work by Nussbaum (2004) on extending the capabilities approach to animals and the interface of Nussbaum s work with Rollin s scholarship on (1995a). The resources of narrative ethics are summoned to navigate the above-mentioned questions and to explore how Nussbaum s approach and Rollin s notion of animals natures relate to the main storyline associated with developments in agriculture.
Notes
ID: 439713666
Year of Publication
2009
Journal
Society and Animals
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pagination
257-278
Publication Language
English
ISBN Number
1063-1119
Anthony, Raymond. 2009. “Farming Animals And The Capabilities Approach: Understanding Roles And Responsibilities Through Narrative Ethics”. Society And Animals 17 (3): 257-278.
Journal Article