Counterfactual Narrative Explanation.

Author
Abstract
It is possible to reconcile the cognitive function of literature with the status of fiction by mapping out an epistemology of interpretation. Interpretation resembles scientific explanation in that it is concerned with laws. Both interpretation and scientific explanation depend on tuning patterns of salience by representing paradigm scenarios and their relationship to ceteris paribus generalizations. In this context, a Kantian parallel between the interplay of sensory, emotive, and conceptual capacities in cognition and aesthetic experience can be drawn. To account for the status of fiction, interpretive activity can approached as a form of counterfactual thinking.
Notes
ID: 15330454215883
Year of Publication
2009
Journal
J Aesthet Art Crit The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism
Volume
67
Issue
1
Pagination
37-47
Publication Language
English
ISBN Number
0021-8529
Dohrn, Daniel. 2009. “Counterfactual Narrative Explanation.”. J Aesthet Art Crit The Journal Of Aesthetics And Art Criticism 67 (1): 37-47.
Journal Article