Abstract
Voice and silence are socially constructed in conversational interactions between speakers and listeners that are influenced by canonical cultural narratives which define lives and selves. Arguing from feminist and sociocultural theories, I make a distinction between being silenced and being silent; when being silenced is contrasted with voice, it is conceptualised as imposed, and it signifies a loss of power and self. But silence can also be conceptualised as being silent, a shared understanding that need not be voiced. More specifically, culturally dominant narratives provide for shared understandings that can remain silent; deviations from the norm call for voice, and thus in this case silence is power and voice expresses loss of power. At both the cultural and the individual level, there are tensions between culturally dominant and prescriptive narratives and narratives of resistance and deviation, leading to an ongoing dialectic between voice and silence. I end with a discussion of why, ultimately, it matters what is voiced and what is silenced for memory, identity and well-being.
Notes
ID: 615428311
Year of Publication
2010
Journal
Memory
Volume
18
Issue
2
Pagination
88-98
Publication Language
EN
ISBN Number
0965-8211
Fivush, Robyn. 2010. “Speaking Silence: The Social Construction Of Silence In Autobiographical And Cultural Narratives”. Memory 18 (2): 88-98.
Journal Article